Difference between revisions of "Talk:Photon arts"
m (Talk:Photon arts moved to Talk:Photon Arts over redirect: Reverted edits by EspioKaos (Talk); changed back to last version by Mewn As Miraglyth said, "Reference: The manual) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Photon Arts Capitalization == | ||
| + | |||
| + | As Miraglyth said, "Reference: The manual, page 9. "Arts" is capitalized." [[User:Amaury|Amaury]] 20:07, 27 January 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
== Skills, Bullets, and TECHNICS, oh my! == | == Skills, Bullets, and TECHNICS, oh my! == | ||
Revision as of 02:07, 28 January 2008
Photon Arts Capitalization
As Miraglyth said, "Reference: The manual, page 9. "Arts" is capitalized." Amaury 20:07, 27 January 2008 (CST)
Skills, Bullets, and TECHNICS, oh my!
Been looking a bit at these pages lately, and some of the proposed redesigns for them. Just a question: why is there no uniformity at all between the three pages? As far as Skills go I'm personally kind of partial to this setup, which is nice, informative, and refreshingly simple. Then I go and see the TECHNICs page with all of its fancy colors, and one of the revisions like this one, and I thinking, "maybe this is a bit much?" I guess the point is, are the various types of PAs so different that they deserve description pages that are as different as night and day? -Sekani 09:10, 26 January 2008 (CST)
The tables themselves can't really be similar, as Skills, Bullets and TECHNICs are so operationally different (the only reason the existing versions are similar is because their information is somewhat lacking). It's arguably quite fitting that the actual content of the new designs is different in that respect. As to the presentation... that's probably not important yet. The priority is to get them finished, get them voted in and get them rolled out. - Miraglyth 16:03, 26 January 2008 (CST)
