Talk:TECHNICs

From PSU Cyril Wiki
Revision as of 20:16, 18 October 2006 by Mewn (talk | contribs) (Talk:Techniques moved to Talk:TECHNICS: Official localization.)

Jump to: navigation, search

Nuts?

  • What kind of joke is this last edit? >_> - Tycho
    • # (diff) (hist) . . ! Techniques‎; 21:39 . . 70.250.43.212 (Talk | block) (→List of Techniques - )
    • Whois report for "Lord_De_Seis": Address: communist@ppp-70-250-43-212.

Ding dong, we have a winner. It's Bea, he said he'd do this as a joke, I didn't think he was serious >_>;; Mewn

New Techniques Added

  • Three new images popped up on the image board showing even more new techniques. This is the stuff I've been waiting for, so I'm pumped about this right now. I just added in the new techniques that have been shown thus far, many of which are the replacements for shifta, deband, jellen and zalure. From what I can tell, the -deal suffix indicates a negative buff tech while the -al suffix indicates a buff tech. EspioKaos 10:13, 27 August 2006 (PDT)
  • Yeah, these are awesome. My guess is that Retial is the Technique equivalent of the Buff Item Retialide/Letialide (this site uses Letia though) and therefore increases TAP and MST, as the item does. On a side note, the Buff Item and the Technique should remain consistent, in my opinion, so should we use 'Ret-' or 'Let-'? Mewn 12:09, 27 August 2006 (PDT)
  • Tycho: *votes 'l'*
  • I think we should go with 're' as the prefix. It would tie in better with the light series of techniques since those all seem to have the same prefix: resta, regene, regrants. EspioKaos 10:21, 30 August 2006 (PDT)
  • Ah, very good point. I hadn't thought about that. 'Re' it is, then, unless anyone has any objections? Mewn 11:56, 30 August 2006 (PDT)
  • doui shima~su - Tycho 04:46, 31 August 2006 (PDT)
  • Has someone tried the boost thing for buffs? Just to see if it works with buffs or not, cos then you can say that buffs are(n't) included in the boost, and so you can make a boost staff.