Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Dual Sentinel"
From PSU Cyril Wiki
(→About the in-game mission screen discrepancy) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* Thanks for adding the footnote, Espio. This mistake is quite discouraging for lower level characters <g>. I wonder if it's just a simple typo or whether the enemies were actually meant to be higher. [[User:SabZero|Sab]] 09:45, 30 May 2008 (CDT) | * Thanks for adding the footnote, Espio. This mistake is quite discouraging for lower level characters <g>. I wonder if it's just a simple typo or whether the enemies were actually meant to be higher. [[User:SabZero|Sab]] 09:45, 30 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
** No problem. ;) I'm kind of curious about it, too. If it's a typo, it definitely wouldn't be the first; but I wonder if they'll ever get around to fixing it? Which reminds me... I wonder if they ever fixed that "hoton" reactor? XD - [[User:EspioKaos|EspioKaos]] 10:04, 30 May 2008 (CDT) | ** No problem. ;) I'm kind of curious about it, too. If it's a typo, it definitely wouldn't be the first; but I wonder if they'll ever get around to fixing it? Which reminds me... I wonder if they ever fixed that "hoton" reactor? XD - [[User:EspioKaos|EspioKaos]] 10:04, 30 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | *** I noticed this a day or so ago myself, but forgot to add a note. I'll bring it up if noone else does. I believe there was actually another case like this that was corrected quite awhile ago. [[User:S-T-H|S-T-H]] 10:20, 30 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:20, 30 May 2008
About the in-game mission screen discrepancy
- Thanks for adding the footnote, Espio. This mistake is quite discouraging for lower level characters <g>. I wonder if it's just a simple typo or whether the enemies were actually meant to be higher. Sab 09:45, 30 May 2008 (CDT)
- No problem. ;) I'm kind of curious about it, too. If it's a typo, it definitely wouldn't be the first; but I wonder if they'll ever get around to fixing it? Which reminds me... I wonder if they ever fixed that "hoton" reactor? XD - EspioKaos 10:04, 30 May 2008 (CDT)
- I noticed this a day or so ago myself, but forgot to add a note. I'll bring it up if noone else does. I believe there was actually another case like this that was corrected quite awhile ago. S-T-H 10:20, 30 May 2008 (CDT)
- No problem. ;) I'm kind of curious about it, too. If it's a typo, it definitely wouldn't be the first; but I wonder if they'll ever get around to fixing it? Which reminds me... I wonder if they ever fixed that "hoton" reactor? XD - EspioKaos 10:04, 30 May 2008 (CDT)
