Difference between revisions of "Talk:Casino Voloyal"
From PSU Cyril Wiki
(→Idea) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* Just a minor suggestion, but what would everyone think about the possibility of using a "grayed-out" background color for items that have been available at one time but have since been rotated out? --[[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 00:12, 13 December 2007 (CST) | * Just a minor suggestion, but what would everyone think about the possibility of using a "grayed-out" background color for items that have been available at one time but have since been rotated out? --[[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 00:12, 13 December 2007 (CST) | ||
* Might be good. I'd also like to see a "Rotation" section that divides sets of items into the time period they were available in. - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 01:44, 13 December 2007 (CST) | * Might be good. I'd also like to see a "Rotation" section that divides sets of items into the time period they were available in. - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 01:44, 13 December 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | ** I like the grayed-out cell idea. I know of some others places something like that could be put to use, too. With the rotation of items, I could either section off the table we have now with each period's items, or just make brand new tables for each period. Which do you guys think would work/look better? - [[User:EspioKaos|EspioKaos]] 10:15, 13 December 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 16:15, 13 December 2007
Idea
- Just a minor suggestion, but what would everyone think about the possibility of using a "grayed-out" background color for items that have been available at one time but have since been rotated out? --Qwerty 00:12, 13 December 2007 (CST)
- Might be good. I'd also like to see a "Rotation" section that divides sets of items into the time period they were available in. - Miraglyth 01:44, 13 December 2007 (CST)
- I like the grayed-out cell idea. I know of some others places something like that could be put to use, too. With the rotation of items, I could either section off the table we have now with each period's items, or just make brand new tables for each period. Which do you guys think would work/look better? - EspioKaos 10:15, 13 December 2007 (CST)
