Difference between revisions of "PSU Cyril Wiki talk:Weapon template"

From PSU Cyril Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Synth rate field)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Synth rate field==
 
==Synth rate field==
* I still think we should have some kind of note on the synth rate field stating what the range given means since it isn't directly obvious.  The wiki reference tags would be ideal for this.  Thoughts?  [[User:EspioKaos|EspioKaos]] 02:10, 25 August 2007 (BST)
+
* I still think we should have some kind of note on the synth rate field stating what the range given means since it isn't directly obvious.  The wiki reference tags would be ideal for this.  Thoughts?
 +
: P.S.  Good work on this tempalte.  I'll add this link to the style guide.  ;) [[User:EspioKaos|EspioKaos]] 02:11, 25 August 2007 (BST)
  
 
== Weapons we don't have data for ==
 
== Weapons we don't have data for ==
 
* What do we do when we have a weapon for which there is no data (i.e. we don't know the ATP, ATA, req etc. - we just know the name, description, and maybe some other odds and ends)? Do we just leave the unknown fields blank? - [[User:Mewn|Mewn]] 15:26, 24 August 2007 (BST)
 
* What do we do when we have a weapon for which there is no data (i.e. we don't know the ATP, ATA, req etc. - we just know the name, description, and maybe some other odds and ends)? Do we just leave the unknown fields blank? - [[User:Mewn|Mewn]] 15:26, 24 August 2007 (BST)
 
** Well, we could either leave all the fields blank, or simply not add the "Stats, etc." part at all until we get the information. Either way would work. /shrug --[[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 18:45, 24 August 2007 (BST)
 
** Well, we could either leave all the fields blank, or simply not add the "Stats, etc." part at all until we get the information. Either way would work. /shrug --[[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 18:45, 24 August 2007 (BST)

Revision as of 01:11, 25 August 2007

Synth rate field

  • I still think we should have some kind of note on the synth rate field stating what the range given means since it isn't directly obvious. The wiki reference tags would be ideal for this. Thoughts?
P.S. Good work on this tempalte. I'll add this link to the style guide.  ;) EspioKaos 02:11, 25 August 2007 (BST)

Weapons we don't have data for

  • What do we do when we have a weapon for which there is no data (i.e. we don't know the ATP, ATA, req etc. - we just know the name, description, and maybe some other odds and ends)? Do we just leave the unknown fields blank? - Mewn 15:26, 24 August 2007 (BST)
    • Well, we could either leave all the fields blank, or simply not add the "Stats, etc." part at all until we get the information. Either way would work. /shrug --Qwerty 18:45, 24 August 2007 (BST)