Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nanoblasts"
From PSU Cyril Wiki
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Do we really need the redundant "Blast Badges can only be used by Beasts of Level 20 and above." in the table for the tattoo descriptions? '''Always in the mood for a little''' [[User:Mmy|Mmy]] 08:29, 8 December 2006 (PST) | Do we really need the redundant "Blast Badges can only be used by Beasts of Level 20 and above." in the table for the tattoo descriptions? '''Always in the mood for a little''' [[User:Mmy|Mmy]] 08:29, 8 December 2006 (PST) | ||
* I remember they were just put in because they were in the official descriptions. No clue about the English ones, but I don't really care either way. Yes, a lot of repetitive descriptions ''are'' annoying. - [[User:Tycho|Tycho]] 09:15, 8 December 2006 (PST) | * I remember they were just put in because they were in the official descriptions. No clue about the English ones, but I don't really care either way. Yes, a lot of repetitive descriptions ''are'' annoying. - [[User:Tycho|Tycho]] 09:15, 8 December 2006 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should we get some screencaps of the different blast badge tattoos, or would it be too much of a hassle to upload? [[User:PaleFire|Palefire]] 11:17 25 April 2007 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 05:19, 26 April 2007
- uneffective isn't even a word, while ineffective is. I'm changing it back. >_>;
Do we really need the redundant "Blast Badges can only be used by Beasts of Level 20 and above." in the table for the tattoo descriptions? Always in the mood for a little Mmy 08:29, 8 December 2006 (PST)
- I remember they were just put in because they were in the official descriptions. No clue about the English ones, but I don't really care either way. Yes, a lot of repetitive descriptions are annoying. - Tycho 09:15, 8 December 2006 (PST)
Should we get some screencaps of the different blast badge tattoos, or would it be too much of a hassle to upload? Palefire 11:17 25 April 2007 (PST)
