Difference between revisions of "Talk:Humans"

Revision as of 19:51, 26 September 2006

The new edit, 'Humans are good for beginners', doesn't seem very objective to me. Being all-rounded does not necessarily imply being 'worse' in general; expert classes should not be ignored either, and even if characters are 'more challenging to play' this does not necessarily imply they are more suitable for beginners. I'm going to change this. - Tycho

Revision as of 19:50, 26 September 2006 (view source) Tycho (talk \| contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:51, 26 September 2006 (view source) Tycho (talk \| contribs) m (lol spelling) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	* The new edit, 'Humans are good for beginners', doesn't seem very objective to me. Being all-rounded does not necessarily imply being 'worse' in general; expert classes should not be ignored either, and even if characters are 'more challenging to play' this does not necessarily imply they are more suitable for beginners. I'm going to ~~chance~~ this. - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]]	+	* The new edit, 'Humans are good for beginners', doesn't seem very objective to me. Being all-rounded does not necessarily imply being 'worse' in general; expert classes should not be ignored either, and even if characters are 'more challenging to play' this does not necessarily imply they are more suitable for beginners. I'm going to change this. - [[User:Tycho\|Tycho]]