Difference between revisions of "Talk:Twin handguns"
From PSU Cyril Wiki
m |
(→Usage table) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Or we could leave it just as it is right now. Thoughts? | Or we could leave it just as it is right now. Thoughts? | ||
[[User:DaWrecka|DaWrecka]] 21:26, 10 April 2008 (CDT) | [[User:DaWrecka|DaWrecka]] 21:26, 10 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | * I think it's fine as-is, but if we were to go with one of these styles, I prefer the one with the colored backgrounds to match the proficiency tables. (The icons look great in that, by the way.) - [[User:EspioKaos|EspioKaos]] 22:06, 10 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:06, 11 April 2008
Twin Tornado correction
Thanks for the correction, Mira. My mistake for messing that up when I redid the tables. EspioKaos 18:51, 17 August 2007 (BST)
Usage table
I've been working on the presentation of the Weapon Proficiencies page lately, and added some icons for ranks taken from the game. It's occurred to me we could use the icons elsewhere. There's two way I see we can do it; with the background colour of the cell, and without. I'm not sure which looks better though, to be honest. So what do we think? Without background:
| Type | RA | FI | GT | FG | AF | AT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank |  |
 |
 |
|
|
|
 |
13 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
 |
17 | 17 | 17 | 14 | 14 | 14 |
 |
9 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Or with?
| Type | RA | FI | GT | FG | AF | AT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
13 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| |
17 | 17 | 17 | 14 | 14 | 14 |
| |
9 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Or we could leave it just as it is right now. Thoughts? DaWrecka 21:26, 10 April 2008 (CDT)
- I think it's fine as-is, but if we were to go with one of these styles, I prefer the one with the colored backgrounds to match the proficiency tables. (The icons look great in that, by the way.) - EspioKaos 22:06, 10 April 2008 (CDT)
