Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fighgunner"

Revision as of 02:45, 15 February 2008

Opinions on the design

Sorry; I meant to post my thoughts on this last night, but I kept getting distracted. Anyway, I think it looks great. I see a few things to be corrected, but they're all pretty minor. (Types instead of class and some capitalization here and there.) While looking at this, I had an idea for a chart we could use to display requirements and weapon/PA proficiencies. When I get a chance, I'll see if I can create it. - EspioKaos 15:04, 14 February 2008 (CST)

• I'll defect to your expertise on the details, but I had some ideas for cleaning up the main Types page as well after the individual class type pages were finished. In the meantime, still open to design and content suggestions before starting on the rest. -Sekani 17:52, 14 February 2008 (CST)
  • I personally think that the chart used in this page (as of this comment) is fine, though for completion's sake and ease of copy/pasting, there should be a row for TECHNIC proficiency (even if it IS a bit redundant). But that's just my opinion. Also, should links to the specific weapon types be added to the table? Just thought I'd ask beforehand. - Alkaiser 18:44, 14 February 2008 (CST)
    • I don't see we don't use something like this for the proficiency:

X		A		A		S
		S		S		A
S		S		A
A
				A		A
A				A		A

Also, it looks like your :* for a bullet point breaks subsequent bullet points, Alkaiser. --Qwerty 19:38, 14 February 2008 (CST)

• • • I thought about using a table like that, but reconsidered because I didn't think it presented the information in the easiest to read manner. I like using tables for statistics or comparisons, but other than that it seems to be overkill for the sake of aesthetics. Just my opinion.
      
      And the bullet points are still all screwy, what the hell? -Sekani 20:45, 14 February 2008 (CST)