Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mission chart"
From PSU Cyril Wiki
m (→AotI update) |
(→AotI update) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
this page needs to be updated with the latest AotI info. I would gladly do it, but I am very busy with other projects right now... | this page needs to be updated with the latest AotI info. I would gladly do it, but I am very busy with other projects right now... | ||
* Or we could just delete this page, is it necessary at all? -[[User:Sekani|Sekani]] 20:56, 9 February 2008 (CST) | * Or we could just delete this page, is it necessary at all? -[[User:Sekani|Sekani]] 20:56, 9 February 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | * It does need a lot of work, but I think it is very much worthwhile. I still use it as a quick reference to find the highest mission my characters can get into based on current level. I propose we simply ditch the notable drops column, because it would be too much work to maintain (especially given AoI missions spitting out tons of rarz), and because the new mission article format covers all of that in good detail. If we drop that, adding more missions (and fixing the table, it's more than a little broken) should be relatively simple. --[[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 23:07, 9 February 2008 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 05:07, 10 February 2008
AotI update
this page needs to be updated with the latest AotI info. I would gladly do it, but I am very busy with other projects right now...
- Or we could just delete this page, is it necessary at all? -Sekani 20:56, 9 February 2008 (CST)
- It does need a lot of work, but I think it is very much worthwhile. I still use it as a quick reference to find the highest mission my characters can get into based on current level. I propose we simply ditch the notable drops column, because it would be too much work to maintain (especially given AoI missions spitting out tons of rarz), and because the new mission article format covers all of that in good detail. If we drop that, adding more missions (and fixing the table, it's more than a little broken) should be relatively simple. --Qwerty 23:07, 9 February 2008 (CST)
