Difference between revisions of "Talk:Weapon grinding"

From PSU Cyril Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
* So, I started on stat increments. I realize that Att./Tech. fields are still missing, and that the colspan interface just really fails >_<;, but bear with the latter for a bit please. I believe it may at least be useful while trying to complete the figures. I hope this is going to work out. - [[User:Tycho|Tycho]] 17:24, 17 November 2006 (PST)
 
* So, I started on stat increments. I realize that Att./Tech. fields are still missing, and that the colspan interface just really fails >_<;, but bear with the latter for a bit please. I believe it may at least be useful while trying to complete the figures. I hope this is going to work out. - [[User:Tycho|Tycho]] 17:24, 17 November 2006 (PST)
-
+
|-
 
* I'm having some difficulties with this setup, not all b/c class of same make grind the same should i individually list each weapon??? example... tenora brand 4 star and tenora brand 5/6 star sabers grind differently but both are B class weapons, instead of listing each weapon on 1 page, making it unbelievably huge, should i start page for each class of weapon ie weapon grinding sabers (listing all sabers) new page weapon grinding twin sabers (listing all) [[[[User:Battoh|Battoh]] 16:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)]]
 
* I'm having some difficulties with this setup, not all b/c class of same make grind the same should i individually list each weapon??? example... tenora brand 4 star and tenora brand 5/6 star sabers grind differently but both are B class weapons, instead of listing each weapon on 1 page, making it unbelievably huge, should i start page for each class of weapon ie weapon grinding sabers (listing all sabers) new page weapon grinding twin sabers (listing all) [[[[User:Battoh|Battoh]] 16:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)]]
 
** Under [[Sandbox|this system]], Grinding tables would be included in item pages. Needs to be worked out and templatized though... seperate pages divided by weapon type for grinding weapons doesn't sound like a bad idea though. [[User:Mewn|Mewn]] 19:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 
** Under [[Sandbox|this system]], Grinding tables would be included in item pages. Needs to be worked out and templatized though... seperate pages divided by weapon type for grinding weapons doesn't sound like a bad idea though. [[User:Mewn|Mewn]] 19:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 +
** Made one for swords, if looks ok, then i'll go ahead on others... sry if the massive changes, took a lil trial and error to look ok... [[[[User:Battoh|Battoh]] 20:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)]]

Revision as of 20:20, 8 March 2007

  • So, I started on stat increments. I realize that Att./Tech. fields are still missing, and that the colspan interface just really fails >_<;, but bear with the latter for a bit please. I believe it may at least be useful while trying to complete the figures. I hope this is going to work out. - Tycho 17:24, 17 November 2006 (PST)

|-

  • I'm having some difficulties with this setup, not all b/c class of same make grind the same should i individually list each weapon??? example... tenora brand 4 star and tenora brand 5/6 star sabers grind differently but both are B class weapons, instead of listing each weapon on 1 page, making it unbelievably huge, should i start page for each class of weapon ie weapon grinding sabers (listing all sabers) new page weapon grinding twin sabers (listing all) [[Battoh 16:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)]]
    • Under this system, Grinding tables would be included in item pages. Needs to be worked out and templatized though... seperate pages divided by weapon type for grinding weapons doesn't sound like a bad idea though. Mewn 19:48, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Made one for swords, if looks ok, then i'll go ahead on others... sry if the massive changes, took a lil trial and error to look ok... [[Battoh 20:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)]]