Difference between revisions of "Talk:Creawand＋"

Latest revision as of 03:27, 7 March 2010

Hand-crafted vs. Handcrafted

So basically there's this rather inconvenient inconsistancy. In game:

• handcrafted: Twin Crea Saber, Neudaiz Table
• hand-crafted: Creawand＋
• ambiguous: Neudaiz Chair, pretty much any other "Crea＋" weapon.

I'm inclined to say handcrafted is correct, unless people want to use the hyphen for all the ＋ ones. Also, I considered putting this on the manual of style talk page, but I guess it fits here just for being a possible exception. --S-T-H 11:08, 19 April 2009 (CDT)

• I say we use handcrafted for all of the ones that hyphenate the word for the sake of making the description fit into the box. Hopefully Creawand+ will be the only exception to this. - EspioKaos 13:13, 19 April 2009 (CDT)
• Unless they release a rod or something, I don't think there will be another exception. The crea+ weapons seem to copy their description throughout their weapon categories. The wand might just be a one-off copied from one of the others. --S-T-H 23:47, 19 April 2009 (CDT)

Race usage

• According to JP-Wiki, Crea Wand+ can in fact only be used by CASTs and Beasts, not Humans and Newmans. Makes me wonder if they aim these weapons at the races that are least suited to using them, and whether if there are any Crea guns, they will be equippable only by Humans and Beasts. - Mewn 16:02, 11 April 2008 (CDT)
  • Ah, so it does. When I checked their main list of wands, they were questioning if it could be used by beasts and CASTs. But I clicked the "wand data" link above that table and saw that in the list that link brings up, is says what you mentioned. Very interesting, indeed. I'll make the necessary corrections. - EspioKaos 17:40, 11 April 2008 (CDT)

+-Symbol in wikis

• Fuck, this wiki shit sucks. Looks like only pressing history/changes gets you to these +-pages. I certainly hope they're not making a whole series of these + items, or we're gonna have to find a solution for this, quick. - Tycho 17:44, 11 April 2008 (CDT)
  • Yes, it is quite frustrating. To make accessing them easier, maybe we should use the talk pages for the pages that redirect to these. Actually, I think I'll copy-paste this into the talk page of Crea Wand plus. - EspioKaos 18:19, 11 April 2008 (CDT)
    • Oh, bah. Did "Crea Wand plus" exist for this one? Went and made the capitalised version when I saw "Creasaud Plus" and no aligning page for this one. - Miraglyth 05:30, 12 April 2008 (CDT)
      • Hm. How about we keep using this page as the actual article, then use Crea Wand as the redirect (because that's what you'd get to by trying Crea Wand+) and use Crea Wand+ for all regular interlinks? For the edit log we'd just need to get around it by adding the '%2B' in the URL or press 'difference/history' or something? Assuming the amount of interlinks will stay limited, I'm thinking this might be the easiest way around the issue without changing the actual names to things involving 'plus' or 'Plus'. :/ - Tycho 02:08, 13 April 2008 (CDT)
        • Because there is now an actual normal Creawand and because using the normal "+" only leads to the page without one, I've redirected Crea Wand appropriately. --S-T-H 01:44, 21 April 2009 (CDT)