Difference between revisions of "Talk:Twin Penetration"
From PSU Cyril Wiki
(Reduced range?) |
m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Based on personal tests (for what that's worth); Twin Penetration seems to reduce effective range by about 20-25% compared to no linked PA... anyone else have a confirmation on this? [[User:Smidge204|Smidge204]] 17:40, 16 November 2008 (CST) | Based on personal tests (for what that's worth); Twin Penetration seems to reduce effective range by about 20-25% compared to no linked PA... anyone else have a confirmation on this? [[User:Smidge204|Smidge204]] 17:40, 16 November 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * I've amended it to what JPwiki says :) [[User:Natasha Milarose|Natasha Milarose]] 19:14, 16 November 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ** Well I guess that settles it. :) Mind if I nitpick the wording a bit? [[User:Smidge204|Smidge204]] 05:18, 17 November 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Thats fine by me, I used to have Amaury fixing my engrish :P. [[User:Natasha Milarose|Natasha Milarose]] 19:27, 17 November 2008 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:27, 18 November 2008
Based on personal tests (for what that's worth); Twin Penetration seems to reduce effective range by about 20-25% compared to no linked PA... anyone else have a confirmation on this? Smidge204 17:40, 16 November 2008 (CST)
- I've amended it to what JPwiki says :) Natasha Milarose 19:14, 16 November 2008 (CST)
- Well I guess that settles it. :) Mind if I nitpick the wording a bit? Smidge204 05:18, 17 November 2008 (CST)
- Thats fine by me, I used to have Amaury fixing my engrish :P. Natasha Milarose 19:27, 17 November 2008 (CST)
