Difference between revisions of "Talk:Petrified Rappy"
From PSU Cyril Wiki
m (D'oh.) |
(→On pluralising links) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Since it happened here it seems an apt place for discussion: Does the way links are pluralised matter? As far as I can determine, [[Rappy Feather]]s is indistinguishable from [[Rappy Feather|Rappy Feathers]] - hit edit to see the wiki format difference. Given that, I had thought the former would be more concise. - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 04:45, 9 October 2008 (CDT) | Since it happened here it seems an apt place for discussion: Does the way links are pluralised matter? As far as I can determine, [[Rappy Feather]]s is indistinguishable from [[Rappy Feather|Rappy Feathers]] - hit edit to see the wiki format difference. Given that, I had thought the former would be more concise. - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 04:45, 9 October 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | * I could've sworn that when I saw that link last night, the ''s'' was disjointed from the noun. But now I notice that's not the case. So to answer your question, it doesn't matter. (Honestly, I had no idea the wiki would do that when you pluralized a link with extra letters outside the link. It's pretty cool!) - [[User:EspioKaos|EspioKaos]] 06:20, 9 October 2008 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:20, 9 October 2008
On pluralising links
Since it happened here it seems an apt place for discussion: Does the way links are pluralised matter? As far as I can determine, Rappy Feathers is indistinguishable from Rappy Feathers - hit edit to see the wiki format difference. Given that, I had thought the former would be more concise. - Miraglyth 04:45, 9 October 2008 (CDT)
- I could've sworn that when I saw that link last night, the s was disjointed from the noun. But now I notice that's not the case. So to answer your question, it doesn't matter. (Honestly, I had no idea the wiki would do that when you pluralized a link with extra letters outside the link. It's pretty cool!) - EspioKaos 06:20, 9 October 2008 (CDT)
