Difference between revisions of "Talk:Photon arts raw statistics"
From PSU Cyril Wiki
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
For rifle skills online, Level 1 is 121% damage and 56% accuracy. Not sure why this differs from what's posted. Also to note this is obtained as a female beast (not sure if this would make a difference) | For rifle skills online, Level 1 is 121% damage and 56% accuracy. Not sure why this differs from what's posted. Also to note this is obtained as a female beast (not sure if this would make a difference) | ||
* It differs because a lot of the information is out-of-date, as it was taken from Beta and things have changed since then. [[User:Mewn|Mewn]] | * It differs because a lot of the information is out-of-date, as it was taken from Beta and things have changed since then. [[User:Mewn|Mewn]] | ||
| + | * Shouldn't we change it, then? I've been writing down the statistics to mine as I get them, but all I have Frozen Shot to 9, and the rest at 1. So I guess my question is: Should the statistics which are known to be inaccurate be replaced with "?"s, so as to facilitate others filling in the information, or should they only be replaced once all the data for a given skill is known? [[User:Catears|Catears]] 07:02, 2 November 2006 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Deletion == | ||
| + | no one uses the site, delete? - [[User:Oli|Oli]] 08:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | * I've had the same thought for a while. Edits aren't really made and it isn't linked from anywhere (other than redirects). The current pages are probably good enough. --[[User:S-T-H|S-T-H]] 20:27, 21 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:27, 21 June 2009
For rifle skills online, Level 1 is 121% damage and 56% accuracy. Not sure why this differs from what's posted. Also to note this is obtained as a female beast (not sure if this would make a difference)
- It differs because a lot of the information is out-of-date, as it was taken from Beta and things have changed since then. Mewn
- Shouldn't we change it, then? I've been writing down the statistics to mine as I get them, but all I have Frozen Shot to 9, and the rest at 1. So I guess my question is: Should the statistics which are known to be inaccurate be replaced with "?"s, so as to facilitate others filling in the information, or should they only be replaced once all the data for a given skill is known? Catears 07:02, 2 November 2006 (PST)
Deletion
no one uses the site, delete? - Oli 08:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
- I've had the same thought for a while. Edits aren't really made and it isn't linked from anywhere (other than redirects). The current pages are probably good enough. --S-T-H 20:27, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
