Difference between revisions of "Talk:Twin handguns"

Latest revision as of 19:23, 13 April 2008

Twin Tornado correction

Thanks for the correction, Mira. My mistake for messing that up when I redid the tables. EspioKaos 18:51, 17 August 2007 (BST)

Usage table

I've been working on the presentation of the Weapon Proficiencies page lately, and added some icons for ranks taken from the game. It's occurred to me we could use the icons elsewhere. There's two way I see we can do it; with the background colour of the cell, and without. I'm not sure which looks better though, to be honest. So what do we think? Without background:

Type	RA	FI	GT	FG	AF	AT
Rank
	13	13	13	11	11	11
	17	17	17	14	14	14
	9	9	9	7	7	7

Or with?

Type	RA	FI	GT	FG	AF	AT
Rank
	13	13	13	11	11	11
	17	17	17	14	14	14
	9	9	9	7	7	7

Or we could leave it just as it is right now. Thoughts? DaWrecka 21:26, 10 April 2008 (CDT)

• I think it's fine as-is, but if we were to go with one of these styles, I prefer the one with the colored backgrounds to match the proficiency tables. (The icons look great in that, by the way.) - EspioKaos 22:06, 10 April 2008 (CDT)
• Colored backgrounds. :o - Tycho 05:20, 11 April 2008 (CDT)
• Coloured backgrounds look nice, so go with them. - Mewn 07:46, 11 April 2008 (CDT)
• Heh, the exact source of the "rank" cell background colours should be clear now :P - Miraglyth 07:56, 11 April 2008 (CDT)
  • On a related note, the colours need some discussion; On my laptop and on my PC's CRT monitor, the C-rank and X-rank colours look very, very similar. I noticed that the template uses one of the browser-safe colours, but with the similarity it can be a little confusing. I'm not sure if there's another browser-safe colour we can use, but if not, perhaps we should discuss going outside that palette? - DaWrecka 12:55, 13 April 2008 (CDT)
    • I'm not sure what you mean. On tables like these there is no "X" to begin with, and on the weapon proficiencies table there's no X rank icon anymore. And you made this comment after the "X" icon was removed so it can't be that - Miraglyth 13:36, 13 April 2008 (CDT)
      • On reflection, it's of more relevance to the weapon proficiencies issue, rather than any PP regen table. I'll take it there. - DaWrecka 14:23, 13 April 2008 (CDT)