Difference between revisions of "Talk:Required experience by level"
From PSU Cyril Wiki
m |
m (Talk:Required Experience by Level moved to Talk:Required experience by level: Standardization.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Inconsistency and Confusion== | ==Inconsistency and Confusion== | ||
| − | * Ok... one of two fields is off. Either 46 and above are off, or the ones below it. It's kinda confusing as it is, since "Total" seems to be the total exp you'd have by NEXT level, ie: total for level 1 being 39 when that's how much exp you'd have total at level 2 if you hit it perfectly. At level 1, you'd have a total of 0 exp. At 44 the total is being reported as what you'd need for level 45, and at 46 the total is reported as what you'd need to HIT level 46... So which is right? - [[LMekko]] | + | * Maybe the table should be split into more columns? It seems odd that the table is one thin, long... table, for lack of better words. --[[User:SiegeV|SiegeV]] 13:17, 22 December 2006 (CST) |
| + | |||
| + | * Ok... one of two fields is off. Either 46 and above are off, or the ones below it. It's kinda confusing as it is, since "Total" seems to be the total exp you'd have by NEXT level, ie: total for level 1 being 39 when that's how much exp you'd have total at level 2 if you hit it perfectly. At level 1, you'd have a total of 0 exp. At 44 the total is being reported as what you'd need for level 45, and at 46 the total is reported as what you'd need to HIT level 46... So which is right? - [[User:LMekko|LMekko]] | ||
* Whoops, that was my bad. When entering the values for 46-50 ~3 weeks ago I entered them "one row too high". Fixed. - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 20:27, 20 December 2006 (CST) | * Whoops, that was my bad. When entering the values for 46-50 ~3 weeks ago I entered them "one row too high". Fixed. - [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 20:27, 20 December 2006 (CST) | ||
** P.S. Actually, I do wonder about this. Would it be better to change the "total to next" into "total needed for" column? That'd turn the table into something like this, which might just make more sense: | ** P.S. Actually, I do wonder about this. Would it be better to change the "total to next" into "total needed for" column? That'd turn the table into something like this, which might just make more sense: | ||
Latest revision as of 05:19, 30 June 2008
Inconsistency and Confusion
- Maybe the table should be split into more columns? It seems odd that the table is one thin, long... table, for lack of better words. --SiegeV 13:17, 22 December 2006 (CST)
- Ok... one of two fields is off. Either 46 and above are off, or the ones below it. It's kinda confusing as it is, since "Total" seems to be the total exp you'd have by NEXT level, ie: total for level 1 being 39 when that's how much exp you'd have total at level 2 if you hit it perfectly. At level 1, you'd have a total of 0 exp. At 44 the total is being reported as what you'd need for level 45, and at 46 the total is reported as what you'd need to HIT level 46... So which is right? - LMekko
- Whoops, that was my bad. When entering the values for 46-50 ~3 weeks ago I entered them "one row too high". Fixed. - Miraglyth 20:27, 20 December 2006 (CST)
- P.S. Actually, I do wonder about this. Would it be better to change the "total to next" into "total needed for" column? That'd turn the table into something like this, which might just make more sense:
| Level | Requires | To Next |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | 0 | 39 |
| 02 | 39 | 141 |
| 03 | 180 | 246 |
| 04 | 426 | 715 |
| 05 | 1141 | 1197 |
| 06 | 2338 | 1340 |
| 07 | 3678 | 1488 |
| 08 | 5166 | 1638 |
| 09 | 6804 | 2533 |
| 10 | 9337 | 3449 |
- Once again, thoughts? - Miraglyth 20:36, 20 December 2006 (CST)
- Looks fine; makes more sense. - Tycho 01:50, 21 December 2006 (CST)
