Difference between revisions of "Talk:Weapon proficiencies"

From PSU Cyril Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Table improvements)
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
** Just do the AoI table. We will get the system updates in under a month, and they will apply even to people stuck on vanilla PSU. On a side note, I think it would looks nice if we altered the table spacing to make the rank cell for each weapon roughly square. Would just look better, I think. --[[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 14:36, 29 October 2007 (CDT)
 
** Just do the AoI table. We will get the system updates in under a month, and they will apply even to people stuck on vanilla PSU. On a side note, I think it would looks nice if we altered the table spacing to make the rank cell for each weapon roughly square. Would just look better, I think. --[[User:Qwerty|Qwerty]] 14:36, 29 October 2007 (CDT)
 
*** OK.  I have to agree with the rank cell being square, too.  I tried a few things while I was at work earlier, but I'm running into that issue of a template breaking any other commands you put around it.  I'll mess around with it when I have more time. - [[User:EspioKaos|EspioKaos]] 22:50, 29 October 2007 (CDT)
 
*** OK.  I have to agree with the rank cell being square, too.  I tried a few things while I was at work earlier, but I'm running into that issue of a template breaking any other commands you put around it.  I'll mess around with it when I have more time. - [[User:EspioKaos|EspioKaos]] 22:50, 29 October 2007 (CDT)
 +
**** On a semi-related note, is there any particular reason we're not using the icons from the game for displaying the C, B, A and S? Copyright would be a concern I admit, but since we're already using the weapon icons from the game, I wouldn't have thought this would be the case. At any rate, I went ahead and set up a template for weapon proficiencies then used it for all the classes, adding AF and AT while I was at it. The template in question is [[Template:WeaponProficiencies]]. This should have the advantage that if we decide against using the icons and can figure out how to make the rank cells square, we only need to change it on that one template. - [[User:DaWrecka|DaWrecka]] 17:51, 9 April 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 22:51, 9 April 2008

Table improvements

  • As you may have noticed, I've updated the Fortetecher proficiency table to include the four new weapon categories. I also changed all weapon names to their respective icon. Thing is, I was wonder if we should include both the original pre-AotI table along with the AotI table? Thoughts? - EspioKaos 13:19, 29 October 2007 (CDT)
    • Just do the AoI table. We will get the system updates in under a month, and they will apply even to people stuck on vanilla PSU. On a side note, I think it would looks nice if we altered the table spacing to make the rank cell for each weapon roughly square. Would just look better, I think. --Qwerty 14:36, 29 October 2007 (CDT)
      • OK. I have to agree with the rank cell being square, too. I tried a few things while I was at work earlier, but I'm running into that issue of a template breaking any other commands you put around it. I'll mess around with it when I have more time. - EspioKaos 22:50, 29 October 2007 (CDT)
        • On a semi-related note, is there any particular reason we're not using the icons from the game for displaying the C, B, A and S? Copyright would be a concern I admit, but since we're already using the weapon icons from the game, I wouldn't have thought this would be the case. At any rate, I went ahead and set up a template for weapon proficiencies then used it for all the classes, adding AF and AT while I was at it. The template in question is Template:WeaponProficiencies. This should have the advantage that if we decide against using the icons and can figure out how to make the rank cells square, we only need to change it on that one template. - DaWrecka 17:51, 9 April 2008 (CDT)