Difference between revisions of "Talk:Humanoids"

Latest revision as of 01:49, 30 January 2008

Qwerty

• First of all, I highly remember Ulteri being an S rank weapon.

• Second of all, system operators/administrators aren't supposed to be rude to the users; even if they're really irritated with/by them.
  I am sorry for saying this, but you really need to learn self-control.

Calling me, or whoever you're mad at a ****ing moron, or whatever swear word you use, just makes you immature.
Amaury 18:21, 29 January 2008 (CST)

• In case you haven't noticed, we've been putting up with your mistakes and fixing them for several weeks now. I'm sorry, but I'm tired of it, and I'm going to express to you in no uncertain terms exactly how tired of it I am. Do you see the recent changes page, where it says "However, if you are not sure you're entirely correct, or you simply disagree with the edit, please don't revert it."? You do understand that, yes? I don't care if you thought Ulteri was S. It takes one second to type "Ulteri" in the search box and find out that it is 9*.
  
  I am very frustrated by your negligence. In the future, if you are not 100% certain that your edit is correct, do not edit it at all. I have been extremely lenient with you thus far, but my patience has worn thin. Almost every edit you make apart from asinine things like changing GRM to G.R.M. is either incorrect or otherwise disruptive, and you've been given more warnings than I think you deserve. I'm not going to mince words here. As far as I can tell, you are extremely naive and sheltered. You think what you are doing here is helpful. Fixing spelling errors is indeed helpful, but it is about bottom on the priority list. In contrast, patrolling every edit you make so we can fix your mistakes is pretty high up the list right now.
  
  I don't care if you like me. I don't care if you think I'm immature. You don't have to like me, you just have to follow the rules. I think that your intentions are good, but your naivety mistakenly leads you to screw things up. You are creating a vast amount of unnecessary work for the rest of the staff. I don't care if you're not doing it on purpose, fact is that you are doing it.
  
  In the future, I recommend that you thoroughly double and triple check any edits that you make before making them. If you are unwilling to patrol yourself for accuracy, then we will have no recourse other than removing your editing privileges.
  
  Is this quite clear? --Qwerty 19:07, 29 January 2008 (CST)

• Fine, fine, it's clear.

However, on a side note: "Even when EspioKaos temporary suspended my account because I reverted Sarin's page because I thought it got hacked by someone because of the way the text was." Anyway, when EspioKaos wrote me that little note on my Talk page, he never once said anything rude or vulgar to me. He was firm, but not rude or vulgar. Amaury 19:37, 29 January 2008 (CST)

• • The intent of my language was to get your attention. It seems to have served its purpose. Real people in the real world use real bad words at times; you'd best get used to not taking it personally. --Qwerty 19:40, 29 January 2008 (CST)

• It's not that it offended me or anything, but System administrators shouldn't really speak with anybody that way. Amaury 19:43, 29 January 2008 (CST)
• So now that we've established that you're just on your moral high horse, since this apparently didn't offend, can you please get off it? This is extremely tiresome. - Mewn 19:49, 29 January 2008 (CST)