Difference between revisions of "Talk:Line shield boards"
From PSU Cyril Wiki
(New page: == Comments == Not to be overly bossy with the commets lately, but: * Wouldn't this be better off unified with the Line shields article, i.e. leaving the prices to the (linked) articl...) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
All of the above, again, [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 15:15, 23 December 2007 (CST) | All of the above, again, [[User:Miraglyth|Miraglyth]] 15:15, 23 December 2007 (CST) | ||
+ | * I'm pretty fond of having a separate article that lists boards, but I'm willing to try it out. Is this what you mean as far as how it should look? | ||
+ | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center" | ||
+ | ! rowspan="2" | Rank !! rowspan="2" | Name !! rowspan="2" | Maker !! rowspan="2" | Def. !! rowspan="2" | Eva. !! rowspan="2" | Ment. !! rowspan="2" | End. !! colspan="4" | Slots !! rowspan="2" | Req. !! rowspan="2" | Ele. !! rowspan="2" | Ver. !! rowspan="2" | Board name !! rowspan="2" colspan="2" | Required materials !! rowspan="2" | Uses | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! H || A || B || E | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | {{Color-C}} rowspan="2" | 1★ || rowspan="2" | [[Carline]] || rowspan="2" | {{Logo-G}} | rowspan="2" | 14 || rowspan="2" | 27 || rowspan="2" | 17 || rowspan="2" | 0 || rowspan="2" | - || rowspan="2" | - || rowspan="2" | - || rowspan="2" | - || rowspan="2" | 5 || rowspan="2" | {{Neutral}} || rowspan="2" | {{PSU version}} || rowspan="2" | [B] [[Carline]] || [[???-photon]] x3 || [[Acenaline]] x1 || rowspan="2" | 5 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | colspan="2" | [[Nanosilica]] x1 | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | * Board name might be redundant, but aren't there certain line shields where the name on the board they require is slightly different from the finished product? I know there are some weapons like that, but I'm not certain about line shields. Anyway, I think it looks... strange. There's just a lot of open space in the cells due to the rowspan. I could put the third ingredient to the right of the first two, but that'd be pushing it as far as our recommended resolution goes. And then we'd have to find a nice looking way to display the fourth ingredient for the line shields that have one. - [[User:EspioKaos|EspioKaos]] 19:17, 23 December 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 01:17, 24 December 2007
Comments
Not to be overly bossy with the commets lately, but:
- Wouldn't this be better off unified with the Line shields article, i.e. leaving the prices to the (linked) articles of the shields themselves?
- At the site's recommended 1024x768 the table may fit without the need for rowspans.
- Failing that, the comments section as used by the Line shields article to show set bonuses or racial starting gear may not be required, freeing up the remaining space.
- If after all that rowspan is still required, I'm not entirely certain about colspan on the second row for shields with only 3 ingredients.
All of the above, again, Miraglyth 15:15, 23 December 2007 (CST)
- I'm pretty fond of having a separate article that lists boards, but I'm willing to try it out. Is this what you mean as far as how it should look?
Rank | Name | Maker | Def. | Eva. | Ment. | End. | Slots | Req. | Ele. | Ver. | Board name | Required materials | Uses | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H | A | B | E | ||||||||||||||
1★ | Carline | | rowspan="2" | 14 | 27 | 17 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 5 | [B] Carline | ???-photon x3 | Acenaline x1 | 5 | |||
Nanosilica x1 |
- Board name might be redundant, but aren't there certain line shields where the name on the board they require is slightly different from the finished product? I know there are some weapons like that, but I'm not certain about line shields. Anyway, I think it looks... strange. There's just a lot of open space in the cells due to the rowspan. I could put the third ingredient to the right of the first two, but that'd be pushing it as far as our recommended resolution goes. And then we'd have to find a nice looking way to display the fourth ingredient for the line shields that have one. - EspioKaos 19:17, 23 December 2007 (CST)