Difference between revisions of "Talk:TECHNICs"
From PSU Cyril Wiki
m (→Shifta, Deband, etc) |
(→Shifta, Deband, etc) |
||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
* [http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://suimasen.sakura.ne.jp/aaaphp/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=2&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Djp%2Bpsu%2Bwiki%26hl%3Den%26hs%3DRbK%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-GB:official_s%26sa%3DG Take a look for yourself.] This doesn't mean a level 10 buff is useless (in situations where no other buffer is available, 10% is still useful), though it is nowhere near as good as a level 30 buff. [[User:Mewn|Mewn]] 09:47, 14 January 2007 (CST) | * [http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://suimasen.sakura.ne.jp/aaaphp/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=2&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Djp%2Bpsu%2Bwiki%26hl%3Den%26hs%3DRbK%26lr%3D%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-GB:official_s%26sa%3DG Take a look for yourself.] This doesn't mean a level 10 buff is useless (in situations where no other buffer is available, 10% is still useful), though it is nowhere near as good as a level 30 buff. [[User:Mewn|Mewn]] 09:47, 14 January 2007 (CST) | ||
* [http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpsu.fei-yen.jp%2Fwiki%2Fhtml%2FDB2FA5D5A5A9A5C8A5F3A5A2A1BCA5C42FA5C6A5AFA5CBA5C3A5AF2FCAE4BDF5A5C6A5AFA5CBA5C3A5AF.html&langpair=ja%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8 Relevant page] ^^ --[[User:Seikas2|Seikas2]] 10:38, 14 January 2007 (CST) | * [http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fpsu.fei-yen.jp%2Fwiki%2Fhtml%2FDB2FA5D5A5A9A5C8A5F3A5A2A1BCA5C42FA5C6A5AFA5CBA5C3A5AF2FCAE4BDF5A5C6A5AFA5CBA5C3A5AF.html&langpair=ja%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF8 Relevant page] ^^ --[[User:Seikas2|Seikas2]] 10:38, 14 January 2007 (CST) | ||
+ | * I meant to post that exact page, but it must have messed up. My bad >_< [[User:Mewn|Mewn]] 12:23, 14 January 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 18:23, 14 January 2007
Contents
Proposed revision
- User:Seikas2/Sandbox --Seikas2 13:34, 14 December 2006 (PST)
- I actually prefer the table as it appeared here. Mewn 13:52, 14 December 2006 (PST)
- There was a weird rendering problem (some of the lines were missing) the last time I viewed that on the live wiki. That didn't appear on my development wiki. The problem seems to have disappeared now. Merged formatting into current revision. --Seikas2 13:59, 14 December 2006 (PST)
- Love it. - Tycho 10:15, 15 December 2006 (PST)
Redirects to TECHNIC page
- Since I fail miserably at wikis, how do you remove redirects? I'd like to try and make pages for each of the photon arts currently available online, like the ones I put up for Foie and Diga, if possible. SiegeV 18:25, 8 December 2006 (EDT)
- After you get redirected, there is a link below the title, e.g. (Redirected from Agdeal). Either click on that link, or put &redirect=no after the title of the page.
Nuts?
- What kind of joke is this last edit? >_> - Tycho
- # (diff) (hist) . . ! Techniques; 21:39 . . 70.250.43.212 (Talk | block) (→List of Techniques - )
- Whois report for "Lord_De_Seis": Address: communist@ppp-70-250-43-212.
Ding dong, we have a winner. It's Bea, he said he'd do this as a joke, I didn't think he was serious >_>;; Mewn
New Techniques Added
- Three new images popped up on the image board showing even more new techniques. This is the stuff I've been waiting for, so I'm pumped about this right now. I just added in the new techniques that have been shown thus far, many of which are the replacements for shifta, deband, jellen and zalure. From what I can tell, the -deal suffix indicates a negative buff tech while the -al suffix indicates a buff tech. EspioKaos 10:13, 27 August 2006 (PDT)
- Yeah, these are awesome. My guess is that Retial is the Technique equivalent of the Buff Item Retialide/Letialide (this site uses Letia though) and therefore increases TAP and MST, as the item does. On a side note, the Buff Item and the Technique should remain consistent, in my opinion, so should we use 'Ret-' or 'Let-'? Mewn 12:09, 27 August 2006 (PDT)
- Tycho: *votes 'l'*
- I think we should go with 're' as the prefix. It would tie in better with the light series of techniques since those all seem to have the same prefix: resta, regene, regrants. EspioKaos 10:21, 30 August 2006 (PDT)
- Ah, very good point. I hadn't thought about that. 'Re' it is, then, unless anyone has any objections? Mewn 11:56, 30 August 2006 (PDT)
- doui shima~su - Tycho 04:46, 31 August 2006 (PDT)
- Has someone tried the boost thing for buffs? Just to see if it works with buffs or not, cos then you can say that buffs are(n't) included in the boost, and so you can make a boost staff.
Shifta, Jellen, et al
- I noticed that the names got changed... any source for this? Has someone been playing offline Story? Mewn 23:52, 24 October 2006 (PDT)
- Sorry, that was me. I didn't notice until after I'd posted the edits that I wasn't signed in. I bought the strategy guide while at work yesterday, and edited in the new tech names when I got home. I'm slightly disappointed that they opted to go back to S/D/J/Z as opposed to sticking with the new names. EspioKaos 05:16, 25 October 2006 (PDT)
- Ah, ok. I'm not really surprised by the change mind, especially after the changing of Regene to Reverser. Mewn 12:19, 25 October 2006 (PDT)
New Names
- 'Noszande'? 'Regrant'? Are they for real?.. >_< - Tycho
- According to the guide, yes. I question noszande, but it appears multiple times in the guide as that and not 'noszonde'. We should be able to confirm them in game very soon, though. EspioKaos 05:16, 25 October 2006 (PDT)
- What to trust? An apparently crappy strategy guide or an obviously crappy translation team? :/ Mewn 12:19, 25 October 2006 (PDT)
Shifta, Deband, etc
- I already know what the difference between level 1, 11, and 21 buffs are (radius of casting and duration) except what the amount of ATP, DEF, etc increased really is. Is there anyway to test this? Does it mean that a level 10 buff is useless, a level 20 is average and a level 30 is the best? Or does it only affect radius and duration? Cavarcous 05:53, 14 January 2007 (CST)
- Take a look for yourself. This doesn't mean a level 10 buff is useless (in situations where no other buffer is available, 10% is still useful), though it is nowhere near as good as a level 30 buff. Mewn 09:47, 14 January 2007 (CST)
- Relevant page ^^ --Seikas2 10:38, 14 January 2007 (CST)
- I meant to post that exact page, but it must have messed up. My bad >_< Mewn 12:23, 14 January 2007 (CST)